"The recent cheating scandal among first-year M.B.A. students at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business -- 33 students were found guilty of inappropriate collaboration on a take-home test and one was found guilty of lying (The Chronicle, April 30) -- reflects how technology has changed the world, why the notion of what constitutes cheating may need to be re-evaluated, "and how academia and corporations are confused about it all, sending split messages," according to Michelle Conlin, a senior writer at the magazine.
We're told it's all about teamwork and shared information," one of the accused students writes, "But then we're graded and ranked as individuals. We assess everybody as single entities. But then we plop them into an interdependent world and tell them their success hinges on creative collaboration."
While professors and employers "need to be able to test individual ability," according to that student, " it may be time for a fresh take on the assessment process. At Stanford University's Institute of Design, for instance, the emphasis on collaboration makes cheating almost impossible. As one professor at the school said, "If you found somebody to help you write an exam, in our view that's a sign of an inventive person who gets stuff done."
What do you think? Is learning becoming more and more of a social process embedded in a larger network?
No comments:
Post a Comment